Cheshire East News
Lyme Green Hall Care Home, also used for respite care, has been found to be ‘Inadequate’ in every area and threatened with closure. The report makes for distressing reading and although it is evident that Cheshire East Council reported their concerns appropriately, the timescales of inspections taking place by the CQC are concerning.
The Conservatives claim to be “working closely with the management team at Lyme Green Hall and are undertaking regular checks”, but once again, as in the case of Weston Park, admissions have been suspended and some residents moved to other placements.
When the Conservatives closed down the well-respected council respite and intermediate care facilities at Hollins View in Macclesfield and Lincoln House in Crewe, carers and members of the public were assured that there would be an equivalent type of care in the independent sector. The truth has proved different with ‘Inadequate’ ratings at Broughton Lodge, Weston Park and now Lyme Green Hall
Despite the Council having its own inspection team, issues are not being dealt with. If, as the Conservatives seem to claim, the Council were aware of the problems, why did it take so long to move the residents to a safe place? Why have we had to wait until a damning CQC report is published before councillors are made aware of the problems?
The CQC inspection of Lyme Green Hall found that the service was not safe, effective, caring, responsive or well led. There was an insufficient number of suitably trained and competent staff on duty. Training and supervision of staff were found to be lacking or non-existent in some cases.
Laura Jeuda, Labour Councillor for Macclesfield South Ward said, “The public need reassurance that Cheshire East Council are committed to protecting the rights of vulnerable older people. It is not good enough to have a Quality Assurance Team if it cannot ensure that people are safe. Families need to feel that their loved ones are cared for, respected and kept safe It is also unacceptable that elected members are not informed when a care home in the area they represent has been found to be Inadequate, and have to read about it in the local press. The appalling conditions that older vulnerable people have been subjected to in such establishments is absolutely disgraceful. These are Safeguarding issues and just like safeguarding children, it is everybody’s responsibility to protect adults as well, not just that of the Portfolio Holder and the Adult Social Care team. ”
Joy Bratherton, Labour Councillor for Crewe North said: ‘’When Cheshire East Council closed the Respite and Intermediate Care facilities at Hollins View in Macclesfield and Lincoln House in Crewe, carers and members of the public were assured that there would be an equivalent type of care in the independent sector. Both Hollins View and Lincoln House provided an excellent service to both respite users and also to patients discharged from hospital for a period of intermediate care. Both Hollins View and Lincoln House consistently received excellent results from CQC Inspections, staff were caring and both the people using the facility and their Carers valued the service.
Adult Social Care needs to be consistent, while we know that many residential homes provide excellent care, there are unfortunately too many that do not.’’
Lyme Green Hall Care Home, also used for respite care, has been found to be ‘Inadequate’ in every area and threatened with closure. The report makes for distressing reading and...
What is the Record for the number of ongoing police investigations around one council? There are now FIVE police investigations swirling around Conservative-controlled Cheshire East Council, but the Conservatives seem to be aiming for double figures!
1) An independent investigation by Bureau Veritas found evidence of deliberate and systematic
manipulation of air quality data
2) £70,000 granted to a primary school in Wistaston, where (allegedly) a Conservative Councillor
promised the money to the school despite it not being in accordance with policy
3) reports in the Crewe Chronicle of vile and intimidating hate mail sent to two dissident
4) Land acquisitions
5) The regional ORGANISED CRIME UNIT are investigating contracts awarded to the then
Conservative Leader's personal physiotherapist's company - CoreFit.
Two further matters involving land transactions have been referred to the police recently, including one where a Cabinet member said in a council debate it 'won't cost the council a penny', when in fact it would cost the council £2.4M!
Now a further matter harking back to the Lyme Green fiasco has surfaced, where a senior officer was paid £45k to go with a gagging agreement, despite a Staffing committee having recommended that individual’s dismissal for gross misconduct. It appears that the cabinet were aware of this, yet covered it up for over two years!
At a Council meeting in October 2017 there was laughter from the public gallery at Macclesfield Town Hall when Cllr Rachel Bailey (Con) said;
’This council is putting its house in order. This Conservative-led council is reaching to the back of the cupboard and it is dealing with matters openly and transparently. ‘ Cllr Bailey also stated at the meeting of the full council. " I’m a woman so I like my cupboards tidy". (see attached)
Cllr Brian Roberts, Labour Councillor for Crewe West, said ‘One wonders what else is yet to be found at the 'back of the cupboard' to go along with covering up hush money payments to senior officers? Perhaps both the skeletons and Councillor Bailey’s Cabinet have both passed their respective ‘sell by’ dates with the residents of Cheshire East?’’
Cllr Nick Mannion, Labour Councillor for Macclesfield West & Ivy said ‘The credibility of this Conservative administration is shattered. Every time they promise that there are no more ‘legacy issues’ to deal with, yet another rotten stinking scandal emerges.’
What is the Record for the number of ongoing police investigations around one council? There are now FIVE police investigations swirling around Conservative-controlled Cheshire East Council, but the Conservatives seem...
Labour councillors have repeatedly raised concerns about bullying and the culture at Cheshire East Council. The Conservatives have repeatedly fobbed off these concerns and referred to them as legacy issues. Now that an independent review has confirmed that there is a problem with bullying and the culture at Cheshire East Council the Conservatives have changed tack and are claiming that they are working to address the problems. However, the same people who covered up the problems before are still in post. The Conservatives have made no changes in senior positions and no Conservative has admitted any wrongdoing.
In December 2015 Labour councillors tabled a formal motion at Cheshire East Council calling for an external investigation into allegations of bullying at the council, but the Conservatives rejected the suggestion.
In July 2017 Labour councillors raised concerns about bullying at the Cheshire East Council Staffing Committee. At that meeting the Conservative Chair of the Staffing Committee insisted that the issue of the culture at the Council had been addressed at a previous Cabinet meeting and when a member of the committee proposed that a task & finish group be formed to look into allegations of bullying and to speak people who were too frightened to speak out, the Chair quickly moved the discussion on. When the councillor insisted that he had made a proposal, the proposal was quickly seconded by Cllr Janet Jackson. However, the Conservative chair refused to accept the proposal as it was ‘not specific enough’.
The Conservative Leader of the Council then intervened to correct the councillor for saying that there were ongoing issues, insisting that matters were being dealt with in a professional, confidential and systematic manner.
At the July 2017 meeting Labour councillors said that sanctions were taken against those raising concerns. The Conservative Chair of the Staffing Committee insisted that such matters should be taken up through line management. When asked “What if the problem is the line manager”, he responded “Take it to the next level”. Given this complete lack of understanding of the fear of staff for their careers, it is little wonder that the bullying problems remained and the independent review found that, “Some people are so scarred by what’s happened to them or others that they remain afraid to put their head above the parapet.”
How can staff have any confidence about bringing forward concerns when the people and structures in place are the same people and structures that were in place before?
Cllr Sam Corcoran, Labour Group Leader, said, “The July 2017 meeting of the Staffing Committee was a masterclass in how to obstruct and procrastinate. The actions of the Staffing Committee have been shown to be woefully inadequate. The Conservatives failed take effective action to tackle bullying and have let down the staff. We now know that the Conservative Chair of the Staffing Committee knew about very serious allegations of bullying in July 2017, but withheld that information and thwarted the proposals put forward to investigate problems. How can staff have any confidence that things have changed at Cheshire East Council when those who abjectly fail to deal with bullying continue in post?”
Labour councillors have repeatedly raised concerns about bullying and the culture at Cheshire East Council. The Conservatives have repeatedly fobbed off these concerns and referred to them as legacy issues....
Last week it was announced that two further matters have been referred to the police by Cheshire East Council. This is in addition to the FIVE police investigations already swirling around the beleaguered Conservative-controlled Council.
This devastating news sees the Conservative administration continuing to lurch from one disaster to another, with long suffering staff and residents bewildered as to when it will all end.
One of the latest matters referred to the police is in connection with the purchase of land at Cledford Lane, Middlewich in connection with the development of the Council’s new Environmental Hub, occupied by two of its wholly owned companies ANSA Environmental Services Ltd. and Transport Service Solutions (TSS).
In July 2017 the Conservatives voted for £2.4M of extra funding to develop the site, despite Labour councillors querying why so much extra money was needed only shortly after the site had been purchased. It was well known that the site was contaminated and would need to be cleaned up, but the Conservatives claimed that more money was needed for land remediation costs.
At the July meeting, the Conservative Cabinet Member for Finance claimed that the extra £2.4M would not cost the Council a penny. This was shown to be untrue as it would cost the Council £2.4M. A Special Council meeting was called in December 2017 to discuss the matter. That meeting resolved that a report should be presented to a Cabinet meeting explaining why an extra £2.4M was required and why due diligence work before the land was purchased had not identified the potential extra costs. Cheshire East Council are now claiming the report cannot be presented because the matter has been referred to the police.
Sam Corcoran, Labour Group Leader, said, “The clearly expressed will of the Council for a report into why an extra £2.4M is required for the ANSA/TSS depot in Middlewich has now been thwarted.
This joins a long list of matters that the Conservative-controlled Council won’t discuss:
1) Cheshire East Council waived its procurement rules to award contracts to the former Conservative Leader's personal physiotherapist, but this can’t be discussed due to the ongoing investigation by the Organised Crime Unit of the regional police.
2) the deliberate and systematic manipulation of Air Quality data at the Council for several years can’t be discussed because the Conservatives say it made no difference to any planning applications and there is a police investigation - we still don't know who did it or why.
3) the £70,000 promised to an academy primary school in a marginal electoral area by a Conservative Councillor can’t be discussed because of an ongoing police investigation.
This is very unsatisfactory situation, particularly for a Council that aspires to be open and transparent.”
Cllr Brian Roberts, Labour Councillor for Crewe West, said; ‘Just how many more skeletons are going to be found lurking at the back of Cheshire East’s cupboard? The Environmental Hub at Cledford lane has been a highly controversial project from its outset. If it is found that anything unlawful or illegal has occurred during its procurement or development, there will very some very serious questions to ask.’
Cllr Suzanne Brookfield, Labour Councillor for Crewe East said: ‘The regular announcement of yet more police involvement into activities at Cheshire East Council will only inflict further damage to the Council’s already very tarnished reputation amongst local residents and businesses. How much longer can it be before the Secretary of State puts the Council into Special Measures?‘
Last week it was announced that two further matters have been referred to the police by Cheshire East Council. This is in addition to the FIVE police investigations already swirling...
On Wednesday 13 March, the Conservatives on Cheshire East Council’s Cabinet refused to sign up to the UK100 Agreement.
Sam Corcoran said, “Climate Change is the greatest challenge facing our generation. It’s a difficult one for politicians because the damage caused by inaction will be felt after the next election whereas the difficult decisions need to be taken now. So it’s not a great surprise to me that the proposal to sign up to the UK100 is not recommended for approval at this Cabinet meeting.
The Conservative policy is certainly to speak in favour of doing something about climate change, but not actually grasp the nettle. By contrast Labour’s Industrial Strategy sets two initial missions - one focussed on outputs related to the green economy, and one focussed on the inputs necessary to make the UK an innovation nation.
That is the vision I have for Cheshire East; Cheshire is renowned as a green county with beautiful countryside. We should promote that vision and promote Cheshire East as a place where the green economy can thrive. We have geothermal potential under Crewe. Cheshire East Council should be promoting green energy.
Labour-controlled Cheshire West & Chester Council has signed up to the UK100 Agreement. I am disappointed that Conservative-controlled Cheshire East Council has refused to sign up to the UK100 Agreement.“
In December Councillor Sam Corcoran had proposed the following motion at Cheshire East Council
This Council acknowledges;
- the historic commitments made at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change
Conference in Paris toward the future of renewable energy;
- our responsibility to help secure an environmentally sustainable future for
our residents and in relation to the global effects of anthropogenic climate
This Council subsequently notes that;
- despite the Paris Agreement placing no binding commitments upon local
government institutions, we as a Council can still play our part in the global
movement towards a sustainable energy future;
- additional benefits of the development of green industries include the
potential to create well-paid, high-skilled employment locally, regionally and
- the UK100 Agreement pledge outlines the ambition for the UK regions to
exceed the Paris Climate targets through achieving 100% ‘clean energy’
usage by 2050.
In light of this, this Council therefore resolves to;
- match the ambitions of the UK100 Agreement through pledging to achieve
100% clean energy across Cheshire East Council’s full range of functions by
2050 (defined as 70% from fully renewable sources [Wind, Water, Solar],
with the remainder from other low CO2 forms of energy production, in line
with ambitious post-2040 energy mix forecasts;
- work in partnership with our residents and business community to deliver
against the commitments made nationally and internationally at the 2015
- turn these commitments into reality through developing a ‘route map’ to a
sustainable future, working together with Cheshire East’s business,
educational and residential communities as part of an integrated approach to
a shared sustainable future.
On Wednesday 13 March, the Conservatives on Cheshire East Council’s Cabinet refused to sign up to the UK100 Agreement. Sam Corcoran said, “Climate Change is the greatest challenge facing our...
In December 2015 Labour councillors tabled a formal motion at Cheshire East
Council calling for an external investigation into allegations of bullying
at the council. After 2 years of dithering and obstruction, and some high
profile incidents of bullying being reported in the press, the Conservatives
finally gave into the pressure and commissioned a review by Sarah Messenger
of the Local Government Association.
The recognition that there is a problem with bullying at Cheshire East
Council and that the culture of the organisation has been awry since the
Council was formed in 2009 is welcome. Acknowledging a problem is the first
step in fixing it, but this is only the first step. The Labour Group will be
working across party lines to address the problems at Cheshire East Council,
that have now been acknowledged, and to implement all of the recommendations
in the report.
The evidence of cultural problems at Cheshire East Council has been
overwhelming for several years now;
In 2017 the Council won Private Eye’s Filthy Liars of the Year award for
deliberately and systematically manipulating air quality data.
In 2016 the Head of Communications was allegedly asked to ‘dig the dirt’ on
the Head of Internal Audit.
In 2013 the Council was found by the Local Government Ombudsman to have
knowingly and persistently misled the public over a planning application at
White Moss Quarry near Alsager.
In the past, the Conservative response has been to shoot the messenger. Some
staff trying to highlight problems have been forced out of the Council. The
Head of Internal Audit, who oversaw the whistleblowing process, was forced
out and not replaced. The names of staff in the air quality department were
leaked to Private Eye. This has led to a culture of fear, where staff are
wary of coming forward with evidence of wrongdoing for fear that their jobs
will be at risk.
The terms of reference of the review were highly restrictive, and prevented
key witnesses such as the former head of internal audit from taking an
active part. Indeed the written terms of refence only allowed for ordinary
staff members to speak to Sarah Messenger as part of focus groups. Labour
councillors pointed out that very few staff members would risk their jobs by
expressing their concerns about bullying by senior management in front of
other staff members who might later report their comments to senior
management. Only after pressure from Cllr Sam Corcoran at a public Cabinet
meeting was it then agreed that any staff member could email Sarah Messenger
Conservatives have repeatedly referred to ‘legacy issues’. Now, by
restricting the terms of reference of Sarah Messenger’s review to employees
who left within the last 6 months, the Conservative claims that the bullying
problems are legacy issues have been destroyed. The Conservatives must face
up to the problems at the Council – problems they have tried to deny and
have failed to deal with for many years.
Cheshire East Council staff deserve better!
Now that the report has finally been published, the Conservatives have no
excuse for not taking action. The Labour group will be working across party
lines to address the problems at Cheshire East Council, that have now been
acknowledged, and to implement all of the recommendations in the report. The
aim should be to make Cheshire East Council a place where people enjoy
working and an employer that people are proud to work for. The current
reality is different
There are now FIVE police investigations swirling around Conservative
controlled Cheshire East Council:
1) an independent investigation by Bureau Veritas found evidence of
deliberate and systematic manipulation of air quality data
2) £70,000 granted to a primary school in Wistaston, where (allegedly) a
Conservative Councillor promised the money to the school despite it not
being in accordance with policy
3) reports in the Crewe Chronicle of vile and intimidating hate mail sent to
two dissident Conservative councillors
4) land acquisitions
5) The ORGANISED CRIME UNIT are investigating contracts awarded to the then
Conservative Leader's personal physiotherapist's company - CoreFit.
In addition to the five police investigations, the chief executive, head of
legal and head of finance were all suspended from their roles at an
estimated to cost the Council of £800,000 this year. The head of legal has
Michael Jones is not an isolated example in the local Conservatives. Cllr
Sam Gardner was forced to step down as Cabinet Member for finance when it
was revealed that he had caused Fomfest Ltd (a company of which he was
director) to misuse donations to a charity. Fomfest Ltd went bust leaving
numerous local businesses and the charity out of pocket.
Although the Conservatives claim that the problems at Cheshire East Council
are 'legacy issues', the Council continues to lurch from crisis to crisis
and regularly features in the Rotten Boroughs section of Private Eye. The
Council recently won Private Eye’s ‘Filthy Liars’ of the year award over
their failings on air quality.
The Conservatives are desperately trying to distance themselves from their
former Leader, but in February 2015 when the Labour group took the highly
unusual step of proposing a motion of no confidence in the Leader, the
Conservatives literally shouted down Labour councillors and formally voted
that they had complete confidence in Michael Jones. The fateful contracts to
Core Fit ltd were awarded within weeks of that vote.
Cllr Sam Corcoran, Labour Group Leader, said, “Labour Councillors have been
calling for an external review of the culture at Cheshire East Council for
over 2 years, so I am pleased that this review has taken place. I welcome
the recognition that there is a problem with bullying at Cheshire East
Council and that the culture of the organisation has been awry since the
Council was formed in 2009. Acknowledging a problem is the first step in
fixing it, but this is only the first step. The Labour Group will be working
across party lines to address the problems at Cheshire East Council that
have now been acknowledged, and to implement all of the recommendations in
the report. The aim should be to make Cheshire East Council a place where
people enjoy working and an employer that people are proud to work for. At
the same time I recognise that the current reality is different for many
“The staff survey reveals a lack of confidence that instances of bullying
will be dealt with fairly and effectively. This is of great concern and is
indicative of a wider lack of trust in the leadership of the Council. I hope
that there will now be extensive cross-party working through scrutiny
committees to openly discuss issues and restore trust in the Council. We
need to move from a perceived culture of ‘shoot the messenger’ to a culture
where a complaint is regarded as a gift because it enables you to improve.”
Janet Jackson, Labour Deputy Group Leader, said, “I was pleased to read the
results of the Independent Cultural Review that had at last been
commissioned by Cheshire East. Labour Councillors were aware of the bullying
culture at CE and had first asked several years ago for an independent
While many staff have much to be proud of, enjoy what they do, and are aware
that things are getting better; an amount of bullying still continues,
coming largely from some people with power, including some Councillors.
One of the recommendations is that CE must set a new tone at the Council. To
enable this there will be a Council wide Cultural Programme where staff will
take part in the design and deliver it alongside members. I want to see all
the recommendations acted upon so that in future all employees can be proud
of working for Cheshire East.”
In December 2015 Labour councillors tabled a formal motion at Cheshire EastCouncil calling for an external investigation into allegations of bullyingat the council. After 2 years of dithering and obstruction,...
At last week’s meeting of Cheshire East Council’s Corporate Scrutiny Committee, the Conservative proposals for "Community Budgets funded from New Homes Bonus" unravelled when it was stated by council officers that the £2m allocation was actually funded from a change in accounting policy (MRP) in 2017/18, rather than directly from the New Homes Bonus Fund.
Cheshire East will receive £8m of New Homes Bonus this year (2018/19), which is included in the normal budget arrangements and makes up over 3% of the Council’s net funding. In the past, the New Homes Bonus has been added to general funds and used to assist with holding down council tax increases. The majority of New Homes Bonus money will continue to be used through the normal budget process. The Conservatives are now proposing in the budget consultation to allocate £1m in 2018/19 and in 2019/20 to community budgets.
There was virtually no response to the public consultation on this item with only 1 or 2 responses mentioning it. Therefore, why are the Conservatives so keen to set up a new £2m fund rather than putting the money through the normal spending regime? Indeed, Cheshire East Council has a history of setting up shiny new 'community funds' with a loud fanfare. The Council set up a 'Your Money' fund under Cllr Michael Jones's leadership. It was money from that fund which was used to pay Core Fit/Amanda Morris Ltd; the police are investigating.
Cllr Joy Bratherton, Labour Councillor for Crewe East said; ‘Behind the PR smoke and mirrors, the reality is that this money should be used to prevent or reduce cuts being implemented across Cheshire East Council’s services. The idea of a separate fund gives opportunities to Conservative Councillors to allocate funds in a way that makes the biggest political splash in the run up to the 2019 elections, rather than using funds based on need.
Cllr Brian Roberts, Labour Councillor for Crewe West said; ‘This scheme is setting money aside and then looking for ways to spend it, rather than looking at need. Indeed, part of this new fund could have instead have been used to help pay for evening and weekend bus services for at least the next three years across Cheshire East. But no, it is effectively a ‘kitty’ for the Tories to spend in those wards where their councillors are under threat in May 2019.’
At last week’s meeting of Cheshire East Council’s Corporate Scrutiny Committee, the Conservative proposals for "Community Budgets funded from New Homes Bonus" unravelled when it was stated by council officers...
A planning application for 100 dwellings off Park Road, Willaston in the green gap between Crewe and Nantwich has been refused by the planning inspectorate. The good news is that the inspector attached significant weight to the harm that the application would have caused to the landscape character of the area. The bad news is that Cheshire East Council cannot demonstrate a robust 5-year housing land supply and has accepted that the settlement boundaries set out in its Local Plan will be subject to further change.
There is a clear party political difference over planning policies. Labour proposes building more council houses and would let local government planning determine the style and location of homes (starter homes and brownfield sites). The Conservatives have let loose private developers, allowing them to pick and choose the sites where they can make the greatest profit (executive style houses on greenfield sites in Cheshire). The result of this ideological capitalism can be seen in Sandbach where permission has already been granted to build 3,200 new homes – an increase of 40% in the size of the town! Without proper local government planning the Conservative policies have let private developers make millions and have left local communities to try to deal with the resulting infrastructure overload.
Under the current government rules, if a Council cannot demonstrate a robust 5-year housing land supply then planning permission must be granted unless the adverse impacts of the application significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits. This gives a ‘tilted balance’ in favour of the developers.
Another worrying aspect of the latest appeal ruling is that the 5 year supply has been set at 14,824 dwellings and the inspector found that there had been slippage against this target and that the Council’s assumptions on lead times were not being met.
Cllr Irene Faseyi, the Labour Councillor for Crewe Central, said “The Labour group warned the Council in July last year that they needed to start work on a new plan that would provide a robust 5-year housing land supply.”
Cllr Y said “Speculative developers are making millions as a result of the relaxation of planning rules. The residents of Cheshire East are picking up the bill in terms of traffic congestion, poor air quality and overloaded services.”
Sam Corcoran, Labour Councillor for Sandbach Heath & East, said, “At the Council meeting in July I said “If we don’t have a 5 year housing land supply then the Local Plan will be as effective as a chocolate fireguard in stopping speculative housing applications.” Sadly the Conservatives voted against my amendment in July and in December when I called for a refresh of the Local Plan to ensure the Council did have a robust 5-year housing land supply the Council refused to discuss my proposal and referred it to the Conservative Cabinet and then cancelled the Cabinet meeting in January.
” Dorothy Flude, Labour Councillor for Crewe South, said, “The government's planning reforms have caused chaos. This has resulted in numerous speculative housing developments on greenfield sites in south Cheshire which have benefitted speculative developers and lawyers who have made millions. Yet still the number of houses being built is inadequate to meet the nation's needs. We need to free up Councils to build houses.”
A planning application for 100 dwellings off Park Road, Willaston in the green gap between Crewe and Nantwich has been refused by the planning inspectorate. The good news is that...
Last week, it was suddenly announced that the Cabinet meeting scheduled for Tuesday, 16th January 2018 has been cancelled.
The official reason given is that ‘Our scheduling of forthcoming business for Cabinet has enabled us to cancel the proposed formal meeting...’
What this means is that Councillors who submitted motions on the agenda for the Council meeting last December, will now have to wait until the second half of February at the earliest for a response.
Why is this? Is the cabinet having an extended Christmas break, or are they hiding away from public scrutiny of the ongoing chaotic shambles that is result of the vacillating and partisan political leadership at Cheshire East?
At the last Council meeting the Conservatives denied that the new Council Constitution would be used to conduct more business in private, yet here we have a Cabinet meeting being cancelled because they say there is no need to discuss any business in public. So much for openness and transparency at Cheshire East Council!
Cllr Joy Bratherton, Labour Councillor for Crewe East said; ‘Why are they hiding? They have already refused to apologise for the chaotic situation they have created at the Council, now they will not even face other Councillors or the residents of Cheshire East to account for themselves!’
Sam Corcoran, Labour Councillor of Sandbach Heath & East, said, “The Conservatives may have run out of ideas and do not have any proposals that they wish to discuss publicly this month, but the Labour Group have tabled several formal motions that could have been discussed at this cancelled meeting. Labour motions waiting to be discussed at Cabinet include:
- Ensuring that Cheshire East has a robust 5-year housing land supply so as to stop speculative housing developments.
- Addressing climate change
- Highway maintenance
- Publishing the ‘viability assessments’ that developers use to avoid providing affordable housing.
It seems that the Conservatives don’t think any of these issues are important or urgent. Whilst many would like answers to these questions, we will now have to wait until 16th February 2018 at the earliest.’
Running scared or ‘no business here!’ Why has the Cheshire East Cabinet cancelled its January 2018 Meeting?
Last week, it was suddenly announced that the Cabinet meeting scheduled for Tuesday, 16th January 2018 has been cancelled. The official reason given is that ‘Our scheduling of forthcoming business...
We have just seen the annual Christmas and New Year meetings of various ‘hunts’ across Cheshire East, along with the footage of the associated havoc and inconvenience to many residents
Labour ended fox hunting, deer hunting and hare coursing. Yet the Prime Minister, in the face of overwhelming public support to retain the bans has publically given her support to those lobbying for a return to such barbaric practices. Only a Labour government will maintain the bans.
The latest concerns follow only a few months after a hunt ran amok on the outskirts of Macclesfield and footage was shown on the regional news programmes. After that incident Labour Councillor Nick Mannion was able to secure a commitment from the Council Portfolio Holder for Rural Issues that no hunts are permitted to cross council owned land or farms.
The Hunting with Dogs legislation urgently requires strengthening to give the police stronger power and the courts greater sentencing powers to punish the minority of hunts and their so called ‘followers’ that so flagrantly flout it.
Labour’s vision is for the UK to lead the world with high animal welfare standards in the wild, in farming and for domestic animals. Labour will increase the maximum sentence for those convicted of committing animal cruelty. We will promote cruelty-free animal husbandry and consult on ways to ensure better enforcement of agreed standards.
We will prohibit the third-party sale of puppies, introduce and enforce a total ban on ivory trading, and support the ban on wild animals in circuses.
We will cease the badger cull, which spreads bovine TB.
Cllr Steve Hogben, Labour Councillor for Crewe South said; ‘Fox hunting is a barbaric relic from medieval times, and belongs to another age. It is high time those that cling to such outdated and illegal activity should have to account for their actions’
Cllr Laura Jeuda, Labour Councillor for Macclesfield South said ‘The UK’s impending departure from the European Union has already triggered a range of challenges from multi-national agri-business corporations that fund the Tory party in Government. They are already lobbying for the relaxation or removal of several hard-won agriculture and animal welfare regulations that have been tenaciously built-up over recent years. We must not relax our guard!!
We have just seen the annual Christmas and New Year meetings of various ‘hunts’ across Cheshire East, along with the footage of the associated havoc and inconvenience to many residents...